Gordon Brown the member for Tripoli South

Seeing how the Sunday Times has reported that Gordon Brown: "personally vetoed an attempt to force Colonel Muammar Gadaffi to compensate IRA bomb victims because it might have jeopardised British oil deals with Libya"; and the Sunday Telegraph is reporting that: "the British, Scottish and Libyan governments connived to free Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi on compassionate grounds" it would seem appropriate to designate Gordon Brown as the Dishonourable Member for Tripoli South.

However, there is also an important question that needs to be asked. With the accumulating evidence showing that Gordon Brown is a two-faced liar and his government caved into to Libyan blackmail over trade and oil instead of putting justice first, and mindful of his call for British jobs for British workers, should there now be a rallying cry demanding that we have a "British Prime Minister for British People"?

Gordon Brown's Libya lies exposed

When people wanted to know what Gordon Brown thought of the Scottish decision to free Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi from prison on compassionate grounds, he refused to say. In typical cowardly fashion he claimed it was a matter for the devolved Scottish Parliament and put as much distance between him and the issue as possible. Now we know why.

The Prime Minister of this country and his government of incompetents decided in 2007 to put commercial interests ahead of justice and use al-Megrahi as a pawn in a multi-million-pound oil exploration deal between Libya and BP. The punishment of the man convicted of the mass murder of 270 people was reduced to a mere bargaining chip as the Labour Prime Minister put the interests of business first.

Gordon Brown talks about his moral compass and takes every opportunity to portray himself as a moral man because his father was a church minister. But Brown has no integrity and no honour. His sum total is a self centred desire to be the man in charge for no other purpose than the thrill of wielding power. His premiership is limited to playing political games of one-upmanship, like this example of trumping David Cameron's trip to Afghanistan. He is completely shameless. He is fundamentally dishonest. He is a coward of the worst kind.